The Human Cognitive and Brain Specializations Group
A
collaborative project supported by the James
S.
McDonnell Foundation under a Collaborative Activities Award, "Interrogating
the Genome to Uncover Human Specializations of the Brain and Cognition."
To most
people, it seems uncontroversial that human thinking abilities, and the
brain
that supports them, are unusual among mammals. Yet,
scientists have provided remarkably little reliable or
detailed information about what features of brain organization and
cognition
humans share with other animals, and what features are uniquely human.
In the
neurosciences, the lack of appropriate noninvasive techniques suitable
for
direct studies of human brain organization has led to a concentration
of effort
on a few model animal species. The
model-animal paradigm, with its assumption that mammalian brains are
fundamentally similar in organization, has inhibited the study of human
brain
specializations, even as new techniques are making it possible to study
the
human brain in unprecedented detail.
In
psychology, the advance of our understanding of human-specific
characteristics
has been hindered by adherence to the "doctrine of continuity" advanced
by Darwin: Darwin insisted that there are
no
qualitative differences in the biology of closely related species, and
therefore
that every characteristic of humans must be present, if only in
rudimentary
form, in our close relatives. Although
evolutionary biologists long ago abandoned this
particular, narrow understanding of continuity (and Darwin himself did
not
follow it consistently, acknowledging there is no homologue of language
in our
ape relatives), continuity continues to exert a strong influence on
evolutionary
psychology.
The broad
goal of this collaborative is to make intellectual space within the
natural
sciences for that part of human nature that is distinctively human. We pursue this through comparative
studies of humans, chimpanzees (the animals most closely related to
humans),
and other, more distantly related, nonhuman primates.
Within this basic comparative framework, we pursue the study
of human specializations using genomic and molecular biological
techniques,
neuroimaging, and behavioral paradigms.
None of these techniques involves invasive experimental
techniques: that is, we use the same
techniques in
nonhuman primates that we use with humans.
Any
scientific understanding of human specializations requires comparative
studies
of humans and the animals most closely related to human - chimpanzees,
that is. The logic is simple: features that are shared by
the
human
lineage and the branch of the evolutionary tree closest to ours are
likely to
have been present in the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees, and
is
therefore not a human specialization.
Given the critical role of chimpanzee studies for understanding human
specializations
(as well as for understanding what humans have in common with our
closest
relatives), we note with alarm the impending demise of chimpanzee
colonies in
the US (owing to withdrawal of support for chimpanzee breeding by NIH).
We encourage everyone who thinks that
the scientific study of human nature ought to be a research priority to
work to
support the maintenance - and, indeed, the improvement - of chimpanzee
research
facilities in the US.
Principal
investigators:
Scott
Frey,
University of Oregon
Dan
Geschwind,
UCLA School of Medicine
Daniel
Povinelli,
Cognitive Evolution Group, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
Todd Preuss, Yerkes National Primate
Research Center, Emory
University
Publications supported by this
award:
Caceres
M, Lachuer J,
Zapala MA, Redmond JC, Kudo L,
Geschwind DH, Lockhart DH, Preuss, TM, & Barlow C. 2003. Elevated
gene
expression levels distinguish human from non-human primate brains. Proc
Natl
Acad Sci U S A
100: 1330-35. Download
pdf.
Marques-Bonet
T, Caceres
M, Bertranpetit J, Preuss TM, Thomas JW, Navarro A. 2004. Chromosomal
rearrangements and the genomic distribution of gene-expression
diveregence in
humans and chimpanzees. Trends in Genetics, 20(11), 524-529. Download
pdf.
Preuss
TM, Caceres
M, Oldham MC, Geschwind DH. 2004. Human brain evolution: Insights
from
microarrays. Nature Rev. Genetics, 5(11), 850-60. Download
pdf.
Preuss
TM. 2004.
Specializations of the human visual system: The monkey model meets
human
reality. In: Kaas JH, Collins CE, editors, The Primate Visual System.
Boca Raton, FL: CRC
Press, pp.
231-259. Request
reprint
Preuss
TM. 2004.
What is it like to be a human? In: Gazzaniga MS, editor, The
Cognitive
Neurosciences, Third Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press, pp. 5-22. Request
reprint
Cola MG,
Seltzer B,
Preuss TM, Cusick CG. 2005. Neurochemical organization of chimpanzee
inferior
pulvinar complex. J Comp Neurol 484(3):299-312. Download
pdf.
Frey SH,
Funnell
MG, Gerry VE, Gazzaniga MS. 2005. A dissociation between tool use
skills and
hand dominance: Insights from left and right-handed callosotomy
patients. J Cogn Neurosci 17; 262-272. Download
pdf.
Frey SH.,
Newman-Norlund RN, Grafton ST. 2005. A distributed network in the
left
cerebral hemisphere for planning everyday tool use skills.
Cerebral
Cortex
15:
681-695. Download
pdf.
Oldham M,
Geschwind
D. 2005. Evolutionary
genetics: the human brain
--
adaptation at many levels. Eur J Hum Genet
13(5):520-522.
Povinelli
DJ,
Prince CG, Preuss TM. 2005. Parent-offspring conflict and the
development of
social understanding. In: Carruthers P, Laurence S, Stich S, editors.
The
Innate Mind: Structure and Content. Oxford University
Press, pp. 239-253.
Frey SH,
Gerry VE.
2006. Modulation of neural activity during observational learning of
actions
and their sequential orders. J Neurosci 26: 13194-13201. Download
pdf.
Oldham M,
Horvath
S, Geschwind D. 2006. Conservation
and evolution of gene
coexpression
networks in human and chimpanzee brains. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A
Oldham M,
Geschwind
D. 2006. Deconstructing
language by comparative
gene
expression: from neurobiology to microarray. Genes Brain Behav 5
Suppl
1:54-63.
Oldham M,
Geschwind
D. 2006. Comparative
genomics: grasping human
transcriptome evolution: what does it all mean? Heredity
96(5):339-340.
103(47):17973-17978.
Caceres
M, Suwyn C,
Maddox M, Thomas JW, Preuss TM.
2006. Increased cortical expression of two synaptogenic thrombospondins
in
human brain evolution. Cereb Cortex. [Epub ahead of
print] Download
pdf.
Preuss
TM. 2006.
Who's afraid of Homo sapiens? J Biomed Discov
Collab
1:17. (available
online)
Preuss
TM. 2007.
Evolutionary specializations of primate brain systems. In: Ravoso MJ,
Dagosto,
M, editors. Primate Origins and Adaptations. New York: Kluwer
Academic/Plenum
Press, pp.
625-675. Request
reprint
Subaiaul
F, Barth
J, Okamoto-Barth S, Povinelli DJ. 2007. Human cognitive
specializations. In:
Kaas JH, Preuss TM, editors. Evolution of Nervous Systems.
Vol. 4:
Primates.
Elsevier, pp. 509-528. Request
reprint
Preuss
TM. 2007.
Primate brain evolution in phylogenetic context. In: Kaas JH,
Preuss TM,
editors. Evolution of Nervous Systems. Vol. 4: Primates.
Elsevier, pp.
1-34. Request
reprint
Frey
SH.
2007. What puts the how in where: Semantic and sensori-motor bases of
everyday
tool use. Cortex 43: 368-375. Download
pdf.
Frey,
S.H.
2007. Neurological specialization for manual gesture and tool use
in
humans. In: Kaas JH, Preuss TM, editors. Evolution
of
Nervous Systems. Vol. 4: Primates. Elsevier, pp.
395-406. Download
pdf.
Kaas JH, Preuss TM 2008. Human brain evolution. In: Squire LR,
Berg D,
Bloom FE, du Lac S, Ghosh A, Spizer NC, editors. Fundamental
Neuroscience, Third
Edition, pp 1019-1037. Amsterdam: Academic Press. Request
reprint
Rilling, J.
K., Glasser,
M. F., Preuss, T. M., Ma, X., Zhao, T., Hu, X., and Behrens, T. E.
2008. The
evolution of the arcuate fasciculus revealed with comparative DTI.
Nature Neuroscience 11:426-428.
Rosen
RF, Farberg AS, Gearing M, Dooyema J, Long PM, Anderson DC, Coppola G,
Geschwind DH, Pare J, Duong TQ, Hopkins W, Preuss TM, Walker LC
2008.
Tauopathy with paired helical
filaments in an aged chimpanzee. Journal of Comparative Neurology
508: 259-270.
Vonk J, Brosnan SF, Silk JB, Henrich J, Richardson AS, Lambeth SP,
Schapiro SJ, Povinelli DJ (2008) Chimpanzees do not take advantage of
very low cost opportunities to deliver food to unrelated group members.
Animal Behaviour 75:1757-1770.
Subiaul,
F., Vonk, J., Barth, J., &. Okamoto-Barth, S. (in press). Do
chimpanzees learn reputation by observation? Evidence from direct and
indirect experience with generous and selfish strangers. Animal
Cognition.
Yerkes
Homepage | CBN
Homepage| Preuss Homepage
Webpage maintained by Dr. Todd M. Preuss.
Document last revised 01-September-2007.
© Copyright 2007.